Multi-species winter crops – benefiting from diversity

Multi species winter cropping systems are similar to the conventional winter cropping system used in New Zealand, but differ because rather than being a brassica or beet monoculture, there are a range of species grown usually including brassicas, cereals, legumes, herbs and grasses that often regrow after grazing.

Josh Bradfield in a waist high paddock of multi-species winter crop.

Multi-species winter crop (Josh Bradfield’s beef and sheep farm, Otago)

 

Multi-species winter crop implementation

Farmers experimenting with multi-species winter crops in New Zealand are finding that the diversity can significantly reduce input costs and eliminate the need for insecticides while maintaining sufficient yields and often improved animal performance. As with conventional winter cropping systems, daily crop breaks are given to the stock, often with baleage, hay or straw provided as supplementary feed.

  • Select a paddock that has minimal slope (less than 7°) and are positioned away from waterways

  • November-January: Terminate existing pasture or crop – glyphosate is often buffered with things like fulvic acid, fish hydrolysate, EM (effective microorganisms)

  • Direct drilling recommended

  • Break fed over winter. For dairy cows 9-12 kgDM/cow/day of crop and 2-5 kgDM/cow/day of supplementary feed such as meadow hay, baleage or ryegrass straw. Rates dependent on feed availability

  • Size of each break is determined by yields. To avoid damage on a wet day, farmers can double the area and remove supplements and then once it dries out, half the area and double supplements.

  • Living roots will remain and the diverse crop will regrow and can be grazed again in the spring

  • If winter was particularly wet and a paddock gets damaged, additional seeds may need to be drilled in the spring

(click on images to open full size)


Key benefits of multi-species winter crops

Environment, soil and pasture

  • Not grazing to bare ground means that soil is covered, minimizing risk of soil damage, greenhouse gas emissions or nutrient losses

  • Possible subsequent grazing/s due to the ability for some species to recover after the initial grazing

  • Leaving a living root will act as a catch crop and help reduce the risk of N leaching through the soil

  • No cultivation required, preserving soil structure and biology, and minimizing carbon emissions and soil loss

  • Reduced environmental impact due to reduction in fertilizer, herbicide and pesticide

  • Diverse flowering species supporting pollinators, beneficial insects and birds

  • Legumes provide free nitrogen that is fixed from the atmosphere

  • Stock trampling of crop will help to improve organic matter, protect the soil, feed soil biology and minimize the impact of stock

Animal health + wellbeing

  • Adding diversity to the stock’s diet can help to better meet their nutritional yields compared to a monocrop

  • Bare ground is avoided so reduced risk of animals standing in mud

  • Greg Low reports his stock seemed more content, do not hog into minerals as they do on monoculture crops

People

  • Reduced opportunity for stress caused by animals standing in mud

  • Reduced exposure to potentially toxic chemicals

Finances

  • Some farmers are seeing significantly increased yields

  • Avoiding cultivation reduces cost

  • Opportunity to reduce fertilizer, pesticide, and herbicide inputs costs

Key risks and challenges

  • Yields can vary, will not compete with fodder beet yields and more land will be required

  • Potential for pasture to still get damaged if crop overgrazed

  • Choosing a seed mix that is not suitable for the farm due to climate, soil type, irrigation etc

  • Unexpected re-grassing costs

 
Greg Lowe reeling in an electric break fence in a multi-species crop.

“The cows loved it. The stock just seem more content, they don’t hog into the minerals the same.

“Our heifers came off and calved down last spring, and they seemed to have a bit of ‘punch’ in their step. They were stronger animals.

“We had a pretty good in-calf rate for those animals…they probably grow out a bit better.”

Greg Low, mid-Canterbury dairy farmer
(Source: ‘Regenerative winter grazing innovations’ video 01:)


Related content on: winter crops, wintering

Disclaimer: The information, opinions and ideas presented in this content is for information purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Any reliance on the content provided is done at your own risk. (click here to view full disclaimer).

Previous
Previous

Bale grazing – cost comparison

Next
Next

Comparing winter crops – costs and inputs